Aldiran art was organized under a centralized institution known as the Aldiran Artists’ Union (AAU), which encompassed several subordinate bodies, including the Writers’ Union, Musicians’ Union, and Painters’ Union. Competitive art, in the conventional sense, did not exist. There were no prizes or public rankings. Instead, works were internally evaluated by an elite council within the Union and classified according to “quality.” Artists whose work received high evaluations were granted tangible privileges in daily life, including improved housing, access to resources, and exemption from certain forms of labor, though these were not exaggerated.
Aldiran literature was not published in the foreign press, and foreign literature was likewise not published in the Aldiran press. In this way, Aldira maintained an inward-looking, isolated literary world that developed independently from the rest of global culture and was therefore unaffected by public trends, fostering a form of deep unconventionality and, in that sense, a unique kind of creativity.
Access to foreign literature was governed by a tightly controlled “permission list,” which specified which foreign works could be read. This list favored marginal or heterodox thinkers from various disciplines whose writings were considered selectively compatible with Aldiran sensibilities. Authors associated with ideologies deemed incompatible with Aldiran Thought—such as anarchism, communism, fascism, capitalism, liberalism, globalism, nationalism, conservatism, traditionalism, and pacifism—were censored, and their works were removed from public circulation and archival access to prevent politics from dominating metaphysics. However, partial or narrowly framed discussions were sometimes permitted. For example, texts emphasizing parallels between nationalist devotion and Aldiran loyalty could be allowed, provided nationalism itself was not treated as a comprehensive or legitimate worldview. Outside political philosophy, artistic and literary expression was subject to fewer restrictions, though eroticism and humanism were especially discouraged.
Reading on this site? This novel is published elsewhere. Support the author by seeking out the original.
Doctrinal themes such as futurism, surrealism, and transhumanism were standard in all approved works, and an institutionalized avant-garde aesthetic was widespread; works that lacked these elements were usually not permitted to be published. However, artists were freer in how they treated these themes, as there was less intervention in specific narrative content; the only requirement was that these themes be presented as sacred and non-negotiable ideals. This led to the romanticization of subjects oriented toward the technological future, reshaped reality, and the transcendence of the human, and romanticism was an inseparable component of Aldira’s artistic and philosophical perspective. What distinguished it from traditional romanticism elsewhere was its deliberate avoidance of sentimentality. This also applied to postmodern aesthetic techniques, which were playful, rebellious, ironic, and fluid elsewhere in the world, but in Aldira were fixed, doctrinal, severe, and stable, while still exploring similar themes such as loneliness, estrangement, suicide, and others.
Themes such as social alienation, lost dreams, emotional dead ends, existential torment, subconscious self, and the individual’s inner world were widespread and were among the areas in which Aldiran artists specialized, and nowhere else in the world were these topics explored with such intensity and almost obsessive persistence as in Aldira. Yet, by refraining from expressing emotions such as exclamatory enthusiasm, sentimental nostalgia, childish optimism, moral preaching, erotic intensity, idealistic rebellion, or reactive disappointment, they formed their own distinctive movement. Accordingly, even anger was expressed calmly, sorrow was presented with detachment, and happiness was considered merely a “biochemical reaction,” allowing meaning to emerge through language rather than overt expression. The introverted nature of the Aldirans had made them individual hermits who felt deeply but expressed little, and this was the fundamental reason for this condition. This, in turn, caused even poems that appeared ordinary on the surface to leave an impact like sacred scripture—this was the aesthetic of austerity and restraint. Emotion was not denied but internalized; feeling was considered “too valuable to be displayed publicly.”
