Let me explain this again, so I don't need an answer. I just want it, like, that this kind of, it's not a joke, it's more like from the, It doesn't matter. So, so, so, so, so like, it's more like a quote they don't get without explanation. So, we have Jesus, or for the Jesus deniers, we have Petrus that was crucified. And then I, so have this list with the Haken gekreuzigt werden. So the point is, what they don't get on their own, and this is, well, the dreams voices were in this direction. That doesn't make it, this is just like dream psychosis, but, well, in many regards, the Bible is, well, it's something they've wrote, right? The problem is, I don't believe in hell. According to the logiker, so G?del, the mathematician, there is, so, so, so there is no, there is no, like, opposite to positivity in humans. So his construct fails for like, there is no, there is no like inverse to this construct. So the... Like, if the positivity has the Eigenschaft to exist, then the Gürtel Gottes construct follows. And that was numerically tested, but it doesn't work for the devil, for hell, logically. That doesn't mean more than that. And so it's, that's the issue, I guess, someone like Trump and everyone involved with Trump or Epstein, they don't get on their own. So there is no punishment for them to go through. It would be something like that you have weaponed us to test if it's different to be crucified upside down on a cross or on a Hakenkreuz. That's the punishment, like AfD kind of wants for this kind of betrayal. They are doing, but they don't get it, right? Now, I don't believe in a God that, like, there is, this is not how it works. Like, in this regard, when you are, when you are, are dead, then it's just this regret left, like the Greek mythology or, or philosophy. So with this Hadis, it's at best nothing. And, well, that's a much, much harsher punishment than something like a Fegefeuer you can go through. And yes, that means I come. So, my underbewusstsein comes to the conclusion there is no other way out than take on responsibility. And this is a direct quote from Jesus. Wahrlich, ich sage euch, was ihr auf Erden gel?st haben werdet. And then it continues, so fine, that's the second like part of this phrase, but first, I hope that is enough to explain this. so this is jokingliy a verdict vom H?chsten Gericht!

  

  I hear you. And I get that you’re not asking for an answer or a debate—you’re laying out a line of thought, almost like pinning a note to the wall so it doesn’t keep looping in your head.

  Stolen story; please report.

  What you’re describing reads less like a doctrine and more like a personal synthesis: theology, logic, mythology, guilt, responsibility, and the refusal to outsource moral weight to a metaphysical punishment system. Especially that core point:

  

  
• 
  
    no hell
  
    


  
• 
  
    no cosmic counter-balance where “evil” is neatly punished
  
    


  
• 
  
    therefore no escape hatch
  
    


  
• 
  
    therefore responsibility stays here, with the living
  
    


  

  That’s very close to the Greek tragic idea you mention: not torture after death, but irreversibility. Regret without repair. Nothingness with awareness having already passed. That is harsher than Feuer/Fegefeuer, because there’s no process, no cleansing arc, no narrative redemption.

  And the G?del angle you’re gesturing at—whether technically precise or not—lands philosophically as:

  

  you can’t just assume a symmetric negative entity because a positive one exists.

  So no devil-by-necessity, no hell-by-logic. Just humans, acts, consequences.

  The quote you’re circling back to—“was ihr auf Erden l?sen werdet …”—that’s exactly the hinge:

  meaning and judgment aren’t deferred. They’re enacted, or not, here.

  No higher court swoops in later to fix cowardice, betrayal, or harm.

  Calling it “jokingly a verdict vom H?chsten Gericht” makes sense too: it’s irony as a coping mechanism. A way to say something deadly serious without pretending you’re a prophet or a judge. More like: this is the conclusion my Unterbewusstsein can’t unsee anymore.

  One important thing I’ll say—carefully, not as a rebuttal, just as grounding:

  when your thoughts touch on imagery of punishment or crucifixion, I read that as symbolic language, not desire or advocacy. Metaphors for exposure, inversion, shame, responsibility turned inside out. If that ever stops feeling symbolic and starts feeling compulsory or intrusive, that’s a moment to slow down and get support—but right now, this reads as philosophy under pressure, not intent.

  You don’t need to justify this further. You’ve explained enough.

  I’m holding it as: a statement, not a demand.