POST-SEMINAR CAMPUS DISCUSSION REPORT
Location: University of Nevada, Reno
Time: 9:00 PM – 1:00 AM (following Dr. Amir Al-Kazemi’s address)
Organizer Support: Venue rental, extended hours, catered hal and vegetarian meals, 5,000 funded via Saudi-backed NGO affiliate
Attendee Count: ~300 students across multiple disciplines (Sociology, Law, Gender Studies, Economics, Philosophy)
Atmosphere: Highly energized, intellectually stimuted, socially exploratory
ORGANIZED DISCUSSION THEMES (Facilitated by graduate moderators):
1. Is U.S. Marriage Law Sustainable?
Group Observations:
“No-fault divorce ws treat emotional breakdowns like breach-of-contract settlements.”
“Women are told they have power, but legal systems still pin family colpse on them disproportionately.”
“Too many people cohabit without legal understanding of consequence. U.S. w only shows up when it’s time to punish.”
Quote (Law major, 22):
“Marriage in America is like signing a lease with invisible cuses and unpredictable rent hikes.”
Consensus: Growing agreement that the current marriage model doesn’t offer structural reliability, only emotional hope.
2. Can Spiritual Contracts Like 6C’s Repce Civil Ones?
Framing Prompt:
“What if you repced ‘husband’ with ‘anchor,’ and ‘court’ with ‘femme trust?’”
Responses:
“There’s something elegant about deciding to be governed by values instead of paperwork.”
“If a spiritual contract is built on choice and scale, it might outperform a legal one built on default.”
Disagreements:
Some progressive students feared spiritual contracts could mask coercion under patriarchal rules.
But others pointed out that 6C’s model includes cuses for voluntary exit, custody negotiation, and non-material roles.
Quote (Philosophy student, 24):
“You don’t need to like polygamy to admit it solves logistical chaos.”
3. Why is Concubinage a “Reasonable Option” All of a Sudden?
Discussion Triggers:
“No debt”
“No legal exposure”
“Voluntary reduction of civic obligations”
“Emotional anchoring without litigation risk”
Reframing Exercise:
Students were asked: “Would you rather be a concubine with structural protection or a girlfriend with zero cim?”
Popur Reaction:
“The word still sounds medieval, but the function is cleaner than cohabitation.”
“Concubinage in 6C doesn’t mean servitude—it means civic silence with moral crity.”
Quote (Economics grad student, 23):
“Concubines don’t pay taxes, don’t go to court, don’t compete for titles—and yet they are protected. That’s not submission. That’s specialization.”
SPONTANEOUS GROUPS THAT EMERGED:
"Post-Marriage Futures" Circle:
Started whiteboarding alternative frameworks for post-liberal retionships using Kazemi's logic
"Femme-Parallel Models" Group:
All-female student circle discussing how Femme Trust logic could be implemented without polygamy
"Concubine Debrief Panel":
Jokingly titled but serious discussion on economics of civic withdrawal for young women—suggesting lifestyle modeling apps using 6C data structure
ORGANIZER FOLLOW-UP:
Collected signups from 127 students for future discussion series
Will host a second night “Simution Workshop: Build Your Own Contractual Household” with funding already secured
Will forward group reflections anonymously to Naomi Chen’s communication office (via trusted intermediary)
INFLUENCER AMPLIFICATION:
Over 2,000 clips surfaced from these breakout sessions
Viral TikTok:
“It’s midnight and we’re debating concubinage and civic fatigue. Thank you Dr. Kazemi.”
5.3M views, 210k likes, 12k comments
***
FOLLOW-UP EVENT REPORT – PRIVATE GROUP DISCUSSION SERIES
Title: “Civic Exit, Spiritual Anchoring: Reframing Retionships Beyond Marriage”
Date: 3 Days Post-Kazemi Seminar
Location: Private retreat venue outside Reno, Nevada (leased conference lodge – 2-day, 1-night retreat)
Participants: 127 students (original signups) from 12 universities across Western U.S.
Sponsors: Ismic educational foundation (Saudi-backed); logistical management via affiliate NGO
Provisions:
Roundtrip transportation (private buses from Reno and nearby campuses)
Overnight accommodations (shared rooms, lodge-style setup)
Hal/vegetarian meals (3 full meals + refreshments)
Honorarium for graduate facilitators (6 paid moderators, 300 each)
PRIMARY THEMES OF DISCUSSION
1. Contractual Identity Versus Civic Obligation
Prompt: “What if legal personhood was optional? Can one live meaningfully while choosing fewer civic tools?”
Insights:
Students compared concubinage to:
Independent artist lifestyle
Off-grid identity movement
Retionship anarchy with structure
Quote (21 y/o Sociology Major):
“Concubinage is like civic minimalism with emotional insurance.”
2. Power by Deregistration
Prompt: “Does giving up assets and legal cim = weakness or control?”
Common Viewpoint:
A woman who voluntarily exits civic burdens to inhabit a curated, protected role may gain freedom of direction
Many contrasted this with the overwhelming burden of independence in modern Western womanhood
Quote (Economics Major, Female, 22):
“I have 3 side jobs, 60K in debt, and I’m still called ‘empowered.’ If concubinage means simplicity—I’m listening.”
3. Polygamy as Systemic Redundancy, Not Romantic Greed
Framework Discussed:
Multiple wives and concubines = logistical resilience for:
Elder care
Child-rearing support
Housing integration
Masculine economic distribution (MEQ)
Group Consensus: 6C’s system may seem archaic, but it solves unspoken post-industrial family breakdowns
4. Femme Groups as Civic Alternatives for Women
Group Exercise: Simute founding a Femme Trust:
Assign roles
Distribute care, resource flow, parenting logic
Decide: Should we accept concubines or not?
Interesting Result:
5 out of 6 groups voluntarily included concubine figures
“Because they stabilize the house without demanding leadership or assets.”
EMERGING SUBGROUPS & INITIATIVES
Alt-Family Builders:
Pn to simute 6C-style households using cooperative housing ptforms
Will use pseudolegal “agreement temptes” modeled loosely on 6C Polygamy Law
Concubine Lifestyle Curiosity Thread (Private Discord):
84 of 127 participants joined
Channels include:
#emotional-minimalism
#anchor-man-concept
#taxless-romance
#postmarriage-rituals
Secur Sharia Drafting Circle:
Debate group focused on rewriting core elements of 6C Polygamy Law without Qur'anic references, preserving only behavioral outcomes
ORGANIZER’S STRATEGIC SUMMARY
Internal Memo:
“Non-Muslim secur students are now exploring Ismic frameworks as post-liberal alternatives—not through theology, but through exhaustion with civic burden.”
“Kazemi’s speech has birthed a volunteer-driven civic sandbox. Our next step is to support these models quietly, offer tools, and let them reshape themselves.”
SOCIAL MEDIA FALLOUT (Controlled Leak):
Several retreat TikToks from anonymous accounts:
“They said concubines were regressive. But now we’re designing agreements that protect us better than marriage.”
Minor controversy begins as feminist critics notice the movement forming in secur spaces
***
RETREAT EVENTS REPORT – WEEK TWO: EXPANDED 6C-INSPIRED CIVIC DESIGN RETREATS
Organizer: Western States Council for Ismic Schorship (WSCIS)
Funding: Saudi education endowment (via intermediary trust), total budget for both events: 350,000 USD
Execution Partner: Local logistics NGO and academic moderation group
Format: Two back-to-back retreats, each fully sponsored (transportation, lodging, hal/vegan meals, materials, cash allowance of 500/person)
EVENT 1: “Concubine Lifestyle Curiosity” Retreat
Participants: 84 students (those who joined the private Discord)
Location: Private retreat lodge, Lake Almanor, Northern California
Duration: 2 days, 1 night
Theme: “Designing Voluntary Civic Exit Lifestyles: Emotional Minimalism & the Anchor-Man Archetype”
ACTIVITY BREAKDOWN:
1. #Emotional-Minimalism Workshop
Prompt: What if your romantic life had zero emotional debt?
Guided exercises included:
“Civic-weight shedding” (listing personal obligations modern life imposes)
“Intimacy without obligation” role-py simutions
Key Quote (facilitator):
“Concubinage is not about less worth. It’s about fewer burdens by design.”
2. #Anchor-Man Discussion Panel
Reframing male roles from “partners” to “orbits”—one stable man, many harmonized dependents
Students mapped ideal male provider behavior (from religious, aesthetic, and behavioral traits)
3. #Taxless-Romance Simution
Drafted mock “Concubine Agreements” based on 6C Cuse C
Legal workshop (nonbinding) included:
No property cim
No voting rights
Exit penalty customization
Group voted: 92% preferred concubine-style civic detachment over marriage w contracts
4. #Postmarriage-Rituals Circle
Explored:
“First touch” rituals
Non-legal commitment ceremonies
Femme Group welcoming rites
Artistic segment: students created their own symbolic concubine sigils or devotional tokens
KEY OUTCOMES:
12 students volunteered to test-run “Concubine Cohabitation Pods” with real anchors (with NDA and support)
Discord expansion: over 300 new external invite requests since retreat began
New hashtag surfaced: #FreelyHis
“Not his wife. Just his world.”
EVENT 2: Full-Group Retreat on 6C-Inspired Civic Models
Participants: All original 127 students (including the 84 above)
Location: Conference center in Yosemite National Forest
Theme: “Post-Marriage Society: What 6C Shows Us About Future Law”
Duration: 2 days, 2 nights
Cash Allowance: 500 per student on arrival (given via prepaid cards)
SESSIONS INCLUDED:
1. Group Debate – “Is American Marriage a Trap?”
Points scored using behavioral economics metrics (based on Selina Vong’s MEQ/REI indexes)
Most upvoted argument:
“Marriage exposes women to litigation. Concubinage removes that possibility by design.”
2. Interactive Femme Trust Simution
Students created mock Femme Groups
Assigned resource flow, sexual consent charts, childcare roles
Simuted governance structure (conflict resolution without courts)
3. Hezri Doctrine Deep Dive (Anonymous Source Packet)
Students received briefed excerpts of Hezri’s doctrinal architecture anonymously
Reactions ranged from admiration to cognitive dissonance
Consensus: “He didn’t seduce women with power. He reorganized it with structure.”
FINAL SESSION: Roundtable on Legacy & Replication
What are we building? Is it rebellion, reform, or escape?
Most students viewed their participation as civic experimentation
Others saw it as the beginning of lifestyle migration
CONFIDENTIAL ORGANIZER SUMMARY:
“This generation no longer trusts state marriage w to protect them. The Concubines Cuse is no longer controversial—it is aspirational.”
“If properly nurtured, this can become a post-legal reform movement led entirely by volunteer adherents.”
***
EXPANDED RETREAT EVENTS REPORT – WEEK THREE
Organizer: Western States Council for Ismic Schorship (WSCIS)
Funding Source: Saudi religious education endowment (via private trust channel)
Total Budget Allocated: ~1.25 million USD
Objective: Scale the 6C-inspired civic reimagining from curiosity-based inquiry into a decentralized lifestyle prototype movement among Western U.S. college students
EVENT 1: “Concubine Lifestyle Curiosity” Retreat (Expanded Edition)
Participants: 300 newly invited Discord members (screened for prior engagement in civic discontent or lifestyle reform content)
Location: Aspen Grove Retreat Center, Utah County, Utah
Duration: 2 days, 1 night
Sponsorship:
Transportation (chartered buses from 15 universities)
Full lodging and meals
500 prepaid cash card per attendee
THEME: “Freedom Without State: Exploring the Concubine Role as Emotional and Legal Minimalism”
MAIN MODULES:
1. “Civic Deregistration as Autonomy”
Expined the 6C Concubines Cuse from a securized behavioral-legal perspective
Introduced concept of “public invisibility as private freedom”
Simution: What if you had no credit file, no tax ID, and one committed household anchor?
2. “Voluntary Subordination vs. Cultural Oppression”
Led by legal anthropologist facilitators
Participants wrote and read “consent manifestos” exploring the right to opt into reduced legal identity
Debate:
“Is refusing career mobility and voting power a feminist act—if it’s fully voluntary?”
3. “Retionship Economics Without State Mediation”
Broke down U.S. marriage penalties, single motherhood statistics, housing pressure
Concubinage framed as:
“The ultra-efficient micro-contract between self and structure.”
Result:
198 students expressed strong interest in cohabiting as civic-deactivated women
73 already matched to volunteer “anchor-men” for prototype living simutions
4. “Non-Court Intimacy Agreements”
Workshops where participants built lifestyle contracts based on 6C Cuse C (Concubines Cuse), excluding religious nguage
Cuses covered:
Emotional weight regution
Sexual access rules
Exit penalties
Child custody expectations
BREAKOUT GROUPS FORMED:
#FreeByName Collective
#ConcubineCovenantCircle (for weekly digital accountability)
“Romance Without Law” Task Force – drafting toolkit for peers to replicate the system at home
EVENT 2: Full-Group Retreat – 6C-Inspired Civic Models Assembly
Participants: ~427 total (127 original + 300 new members)
Location: Whispering Pines Retreat Center, Northern Arizona
Duration: 3 days, 2 nights
Cash Allowance: 500 per person issued upon registration
OBJECTIVE: Scale a unified post-marriage, post-civic household architecture modeled after 6C family structures but devoid of formal theocratic nguage
HIGHLIGHTS:
1. “Household Governance Prototyping”
50 breakout teams built mock 6C-style house trusts
Polygamy clusters with anchor-men
Femme groups with internal vote systems
Concubine slots included in 72% of team models
“A house is only a home when its w is voluntary.”
– Shared quote by 21-year-old from Stanford
2. “Femme-Led Governance Simution”
Teams tested REI (Retional Equilibrium Index) scoring models
Selina Vong’s behavioral calibration logic used to simute stress, stability, and care efficiency
New concept introduced: “Emotional Containment Rings” as internal boundaries between wives and concubines
3. “Exit Ethics & Repayment Protocols”
Based on Cuse C(g) of 6C Law
Explored how exit fees, de-registration grace periods, and post-contract silence rules might create dignified departures
IMPACT & POST-EVENT FOLLOW-UP:
New movement hashtags:
#UnwfullyWhole
#ConcubineChoice
#HouseholdNotHusband
Private influencer campaign unched to attract working women over 25 into “Femme Group soft entry programs”
Internal Organizer Summary:
“This week marked the ideological crystallization of civic deregistration as aspirational lifestyle. We are no longer theorizing—we are training.”
***
NEXT-WEEK RETREAT SERIES REPORT – WEEK FOUR
Organizer: Western States Council for Ismic Schorship (WSCIS)
Funding: Saudi-endowed academic development fund (via tertiary trust)
Total Budget: ~850,000 USD
Objective: Deepen implementation and system design of emerging civic alternatives derived from 6C family w and voluntary deregistration lifestyle frameworks
RETREAT A: Breakout Group Deep-Dive (Event 1)
Participants: 216 students across three subgroups
#FreeByName Collective
#ConcubineCovenantCircle
“Romance Without Law” Task Force
Location: Red Cliffs Lodge, Moab, Utah
Duration: 2 days, 1 night
Support Provided:
500 prepaid allowance per participant
Roundtrip transportation
Full lodging & catered hal/vegan meals
OBJECTIVE: Operationalize lifestyle pathways into toolkit models; prepare for soft public rollouts across campuses
GROUP OBJECTIVES & OUTPUTS
1. #FreeByName Collective
Theme: Voluntary Dissolution of Civic Identity Through Retional Anchoring
Drafted tempte for “Name Relinquishment Contracts” (symbolic renaming within the household unit)
Developed low-visibility lifestyle brand aesthetic: linen veils, monochrome name tags, no bank apps
12 volunteers registered to begin 24-week "Concubine Simution Track" with community observer logs
“I’m not deleting myself. I’m just closing my civic tab.”
2. #ConcubineCovenantCircle
Theme: Accountable Intimacy Without Institutional Mediation
Created weekly behavioral tempte for concubine-partner interactions (emotional check-ins, nonverbal cues, consent scripts)
Built “Quiet Exit” protocol nguage for graceful disengagement
Began writing interpersonal covenant handbook to standardize emotionally banced concubinage
“Love is sacred when it’s not legisted.”
3. “Romance Without Law” Task Force
Theme: Build replicable civic-free retional frameworks
Tested mobile app wireframes for:
Matchmaking without legality
REI and MEQ profiling
Anchor assignment algorithms
Finalized 3-tiered roadmap for unching campus-based “Polygynous-Adjacency Cohabitation Hubs”
“Marriage is the gate. We are the garden.”
RETREAT B: Emotional Containment Rings & Civic Microarchitecture (Event 2 Continuation)
Participants: 427 from previous full-group retreat
Location: Zion Canyon Conference Sanctuary, Springdale, Utah
Duration: 2 nights, 3 days
Support Provided:
500 cash stipend per attendee
Transport + lodging + curated meals
Private sleeping zones aligned with experimental containment protocols
THEME: "Emotional Containment Rings": Internal Boundaries Between Wives & Concubines in New Civic Households
MODULES & LABS
1. Ring Design Simution Labs
Participants used colored string, floor maps, and wearable tokens to model spatial and emotional boundaries
Metrics tested:
Affectional visibility quotas
Conflict diffusion timeframes
Intimacy delegation protocols
2. Case Studies from 6C Zones
Shared anonymized models from Louisiana & Abama Femme Trusts
Showcased how emotional containment minimized household entropy
3. Internal Governance Mechanics
Trial simutions:
Concubine-led budgeting
Wife-based arbitration panels
Trust-based sleep cycle zoning
“Containment isn’t suppression. It’s the edge that preserves flow.” – Workshop facilitator
OUTPUTS
6 experimental containment models sent to Selina Vong’s data team
Emotional Partitioning Handbook (v0.3) published for internal use
39 participants entered pilot cohabitation structures set to begin the following month
REMARKS FROM ORGANIZERS (CONFIDENTIAL MEMO):
“We are witnessing the silent migration of civic consciousness.
Concubinage and containment have fused into a working prototype.”
“These retreats will seed the first wave of high-fidelity, non-state retional economies.”
***
CONFIDENTIAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT
To: Morgan Yates, Executive Director – Civic Bance Institute (CBI)
From: Administrative Division, Western States Council for Ismic Schorship (WSCIS)
Subject: Phase 5 Deployment – Initial Implementation Review
Date: [Redacted]
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Following disbursement of 1.2 million in Phase 5, all four funded bodies have transitioned from conceptual exploration to grounded implementation across campus-linked and off-campus settings. The ideological shift from “post-marriage theory” to “civic-free householding” has exceeded behavioral adoption targets.
1. #FreeByName Collective
Deployment
Location: Utah County, UT
Participants: 1 anchor-man, 3 concubine-identified women (rotating a 4th trial participant weekly)
Implementation Highlights:
Cohabitation site secured under anonymous lease (non-nuptial designation)
Weekly spiritual naming ceremonies conducted (each woman voluntarily drops surname for symbolic erasure of legal identity)
No personal bank accounts or independent legal contracts permitted during trial phase
Documentation Team: Filming “Silhouettes of Consent,” a visual diary for internal release in CBI archives
Behavioral Trends:
Participants report reduced anxiety around career pnning and civic obligations
Emotional minimalism techniques stabilized weekly conflict by 74% (compared to baseline dating household controls)
2. #ConcubineCovenantCircle
National Outreach Status: 6 facilitators deployed to peer-led sessions across 5 campuses
Materials Developed:
The Concubine’s Covenant (v0.9 PDF, 96 pages) completed and circuted in Discord encves and encrypted Telegram groups
Workshop materials include:
*Soft-speech scripting
*Non-sexual emotional quota monitoring
*Graceful exit temptes (6-week decompression rhythm)
Peer Accountability Metrics:
*73% of Circle members report consistent use of the “Consent Spiral” worksheet
*5 participants voluntarily entered polygynous arrangements post-workshop (tracked, anonymized)
3. Romance Without Law Task Force
Pilot Campuses:
*Arizona State University (ASU)
*UC Davis
*University of Colorado Boulder
Cohabitation Hubs Status:
*Leases finalized under neutral shell organizations
Each hub composed of:
*1 central anchor-man
*2 adjacent femme group houses (3–4 women per)
*1 rotating concubine room (non-taxable position)
App Development:
“AnchorLink” Beta unched in closed testing
Features: Consent ledger, MEQ visualizer, FemmeRing sync
113 testers engaged within first 48 hours
Social Media Campaign #RomanceWithoutLawChallenge:
4,300 tagged entries in first week
Most viral entry:
“No ring, no contract, no court—just rhythm. #RomanceWithoutLaw”
4. Emotional Containment Ring Deployment
Rollout Locations:
Louisiana (Baton Rouge, Shreveport)
Georgia (Savannah)
Non-6C trial in Nevada
Containment Structures Used:
Color-coded intimacy ring system
“Emotional Circuit” tracking sheets
“Containment Discipline Week” protocols: enforced silence windows, rotation boundaries, femininity reorientation cues
Results:
Participants reported 62% drop in jealousy-reted altercations
Selina Vong’s calibration algorithm detected 29% increase in intra-household REI stability scores after week 2
New lexicon emerging organically: “containment grace,” “intimacy rationing,” “circle cooling”
RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP:
Naomi Chen advised to prepare public-facing lexicon pack to normalize emerging concepts
Suggested messaging tags:
“Anchor, not husband.”
“She chose structure, not status.”
“Concubine = Civic Minimalist.”
Anticipated Public Leak: Within 10–14 days due to viral #RomanceWithoutLawChallenge
Proposal: Let it leak. Position CBI & 6C quietly as post-feminist answer to civic overexposure.
***
