Event Title: Liberty Daughters Party (LDP) x Civic Bance Institute (CBI) Forum on Emerging Gender Economics
Venue: East Austin Civic Center, Texas
Date: Saturday Afternoon
Organizers: Liberty Daughters Party (LDP) & Civic Bance Institute (CBI, directed by Morgan Yates)
Attendees: 800 (students of progressive economics, cooperative founders, left-wing activists, feminist schors, ex-Bernie organizers)
Speech Title: “Masculinity Is Left Economics’ Forgotten Weapon”
Speaker: Maya Rosenthal
[Scene: A low-lit theater-style auditorium, with sun pouring in through open doors. The room buzzes with anticipation. Diverse faces fill the chairs—many with notebooks, others with livestream gear. Maya Rosenthal steps up to a wooden podium with a subtle brass torch emblem.]
Maya Rosenthal (opening):
“I want to begin with a provocation: What if masculinity isn’t the problem—but the missing strategy?”
[Some eyebrow raises. A few murmurs.]
Maya Rosenthal:
“Left economics has mastered critique. We know how to attack capital. We know how to deconstruct patriarchy. But we rarely ask—what do we do with all the dispced, unemployed, emotionally exiled men after we’re done deconstructing?”
*[Slide: Chart showing rising male suicide, declining male bor force participation, rising “economic loneliness.”]
Maya Rosenthal:
“We need to rescue masculinity from both toxic patriarchy and liberal neutrality. It’s not just about economic inclusion. It’s about purpose, pride, and pcement.”
[Slide: Comparative table—Masculinity in Capitalism (competitive utility) vs. 6C Femme Trusts (retional production role)]
Maya Rosenthal:
“The 6C model introduces a radical inversion. It doesn’t erase masculine bor—it localizes and reassigns it. Men become producers, protectors, and child-raising contributors—not consumers of affection or failed CEOs of colpsed households.”
[Small wave of appuse. Several students start tweeting key phrases.]
Maya Rosenthal:
“We in the Left have treated masculinity like a relic. But in 6C cooperative zones, we see something fascinating: women-led economic models that absorb underfunctioning men and convert them into community assets—not threats.”
[Slide: “Masculinity as Cooperative Infrastructure”]
Maya Rosenthal:
“I’m not endorsing every 6C policy. But I am endorsing this question: What happens when masculinity is not suppressed, but structured? And what if Left economics is only half-built without it?”
[Standing ovation begins in back rows. Front-row attendees rise slowly, then all at once.]
Post-Speech Social Media Explosion:
Every attendee shares the speech with hashtags:
#ForgottenWeapon
#MasculineLeft
#MayaInAustin
#6CFrameworkDebate
Viral Quotes:
“Masculinity is not our enemy. It’s our uncimed inheritance.”
“Convert failed men into rooted men. That’s the new socialism.”
Reactions:
On Twitter/X:
“I didn’t expect to agree, but wow. Rosenthal just opened a door I didn’t know existed.” — @UrbanComrade
“Finally a leftist brave enough to say masculinity isn’t evil—it’s just homeless.” — @BckFemmeEcon
“Maya Rosenthal is the reason I still have hope for left economics.” — @SoftTankie
YouTube Commentary:
“The Left’s Masculine Reawakening – Maya Rosenthal Speech Breakdown”
— 120K views within 24 hours
,...
Q&A: "Masculinity & Left Economics" — Civic Bance Forum, Austin
1. Daniel Ruiz, Co-op Baker & Father of Two, El Paso
Question: “Maya, I’ve seen femme trusts up close—my wife works in one. But where does this leave working-css husbands like me? Are we just appendages now, or is there space for men to lead in these models too?”
Maya’s Response:
"We need to think of leadership differently. In femme trusts, leadership is often retional, not vertical. A working-css husband like you is the core stabilizer of the unit—provider, guide, witness to collective security. The economic model doesn’t erase you—it requires you to be centered without dominating."
2. Lina Kovács, Hungarian-born Anarcho-Feminist, visiting schor at UT Austin
Question: “Don’t you fear this line of thought opens a door to conservative gender essentialism? Isn’t ‘structured masculinity’ a step backward?”
Maya’s Response:
"Not if we redefine masculinity as functional contribution, not entitlement. The Left often confuses deconstruction with destruction. My question is—can we compost masculinity into something usable, without fetishizing or fearing it?"
3. Alvin George, Bck Marxist Student Organizer, Prairie View A&M
Question: “Are we just romanticizing patriarchy with new words? How do you guard against femme trusts becoming echo chambers of gender hierarchy?”
Maya’s Response:
"That’s a powerful critique. My answer: transparency, plural leadership, and metrics that center child outcomes and retional health, not just hierarchy or obedience. Femme groups that fail to evolve—will rot. That’s why critique from organizers like you is essential."
4. Soledad Mejía, Latina Trans Rights Advocate, Community Organizer from Houston
Question: “How do femme trusts deal with queer or nonbinary masculinities? Are we allowed in the ‘masculine economy’ you describe?”
Maya’s Response:
"You are more than allowed—you are the prototype for a new kind of masculinity. One unburdened by testosterone myths, yet capable of protection, support, and interdependence. Femme trusts that fail to include trans or queer kinship models—will become outdated fossils."
5. Dr. Everett Hwang, Institutional Economist, UT Dals
Question: “You mention ‘structured masculinity’ but how does it scale nationally? Especially without state coercion?”
Maya’s Response:
"It scales through trust ecosystems, not central pnning. Each femme group is semi-autonomous. Masculine integration flows through agreements, not mandates. You don’t need force—you need frameworks that absorb male drift into purpose."
6. Ivy Thompson, Ex-McKinsey Consultant turned Socialist Urban Pnner
Question: “If this model succeeds, what happens to traditional feminist economic frameworks based on autonomy and wage independence?”
Maya’s Response:
"They’ll need to evolve. Autonomy is vital—but when it becomes isotion, it’s economically suicidal. Wage independence isn’t everything—retional embeddedness has real GDP value, if measured right. We must move from rugged wage feminism to cooperative security feminism."
7. Malik Darwish, First-gen Muslim-American Co-op Engineer, Dals
Question: “Polygamy gets a lot of airtime in 6C zones. As someone from a background where it’s normalized but problematic, do you really think it's economically viable for most?”
Maya’s Response:
"Not universally. But in resource-sharing micro-economies, it can stabilize precarious families—if women co-govern, and children benefit. The key is femme cuses: ownership rights, dissolvable bonds, sisterhood audits. Without those, it's just patriarchy in new packaging."
***
Ivy’s Speech — “Built by Women, Banced by Men”
INT. AUSTIN CONVENTION HALL — DAY
Dim lighting. Ivy Thompson, 28, steps onto the stage. Her ash-blonde bob catches the projector glow. A digital backdrop behind her reads:
"FEMME TRUSTS, FATHERLESS FUTURES?"
A murmur of tension ripples through the room. Some arms are crossed. A few phones already up—recording, skeptical.
She grips the mic calmly.
IVY THOMPSON (into mic):
“I’m here to ruffle you. Not ftter you. So let’s get it out of the way: yes, I quit McKinsey. No, I’m not here to preach polygamy. And no—I haven’t joined 6C.”
(she pauses)
“But I did read their economic blueprint. And I did walk through three of their Femme Trust cities. And what I saw? It made me furious. Because it worked.”
Some shifting in chairs. A few raised eyebrows.
IVY (cont’d):
“Listen. I’m a pnner. I believe in zoning ws, not zodiac signs. I’ve spent my twenties designing housing equity pns that go nowhere because the activist left refuses to talk about gendered capital.”
She paces slightly, voice sharpening.
IVY:
“We built feminine economies—soft bor, consensus culture, emotional bor credits, gender-neutral communes. But we forgot the masculine. Not just men—masculinity as force, as sacrifice, as risk.”
Muffled murmurs now. Some listeners whisper. A few nod.
IVY:
“The Femme Trusts? They thrive because they build masculine duty into female-centered spaces. They give husbands legal stake, not just emotional access. They bind paternal roles to communal infrastructure.”
A woman in a red scarf scoffs audibly. Ivy hears but continues.
IVY (cont’d):
“The radical left called masculinity toxic and then wondered why our co-ops colpse under burnout and breakups. We sneered at marriage contracts while the 6C crowd built economic families with real estate backing them.”
IVY:
“I am not praising their theology. I am warning you: they’re winning with our tools—gender equity, distributed power, collective bor—but wrapped in a masculine ethos we refuse to name, let alone recim.”
The room is split now. Half the audience is leaning forward, the other half frozen in disbelief.
IVY:
“We don’t need to copy them. But if we can’t talk about masculine bor as productive, not just oppressive, we’re going to keep losing working-css hearts and cooperative territory. Femme groups without bonded men? That’s not feminism. That’s fragility.”
Silence.
Then—a small burst of appuse. Then more. Appuse builds in uneven waves. Some are standing. Others still stiff, arms crossed.
Ivy steps back from the mic.
IVY (softly):
“Thank you. Tear me apart after this. But build something from it.”
Fade to audience shots—posts already going viral, hashtags like #MasculineCoops, #IvyThompsonSpeech, and #BuiltByWomenBancedByMen swirl on screen.
***
Post-Speech Evaluation — Maya Rosenthal and Morgan Yates Discuss Ivy Thompson
INT. LUXURY HOTEL SUITE — NIGHT
The warm, dimly lit room is filled with soft whispers as a group of 6C operatives gathers around a sleek conference table. In the corner, Maya Rosenthal, a soft glow of contemption in her eyes, and Morgan Yates, coolly analytical, pore over a digital file on an oversized tablet. Their eyes scan Ivy Thompson’s resume.
Maya leans back in her chair, tapping her pen thoughtfully.
MAYA ROSENTHAL:
“So, Ivy Thompson. Ex-McKinsey, self-taught in urban pnning, shifted from corporate to radical leftist economics. She did a lot of social work before jumping into the economic fray. Quite the switch, don’t you think?”
Morgan leans forward, scrutinizing the screen, highlighting key details with a swipe of her finger.
MORGAN YATES:
“Yeah, and that makes her... dangerous. She has the pragmatism of someone who’s worked with big-money systems—yet she’s not blind to their failures. Plus, she’s well connected. Look at her history in urban projects in New York, the community-based co-ops she helped design before dropping the corporate world.”
MAYA ROSENTHAL:
“She knows the mechanics. I’m impressed by her questioning during the Q&A. She wasn’t just challenging us; she was challenging herself too. A lot of people in that room wouldn't have had the guts to point out our ‘blind spots,’ especially with all this 6C hoop going on.”
MORGAN YATES (pauses):
“Exactly. She’s asking the right questions. But what makes her most interesting... is her critique of ‘feminism without men.’ She gets it. She understands that 6C’s economic model works because it integrates roles for both genders in a functional way that aligns with economic productivity. We’ve been too busy pretending that doesn’t matter.”
Maya takes another sip of her drink and flips through more of Ivy’s bio.
MAYA ROSENTHAL (thoughtful):
“So she can see the value of integrating masculine roles into the equation, not just ideologically, but economically. That’s the crux of it. Our economy is fragmented because we’re ignoring entire sectors of capital, including patriarchal structures, which—whether we like it or not—still dominate.”
MORGAN YATES:
“Exactly. She’s too sharp to ignore. What she said about ‘masculinity as a necessary economic force’—that’s something we’ve been tiptoeing around in our feminist circles. We’ve always been focused on equality without considering how to harness the power dynamics and leverage them toward a common goal.”
MAYA ROSENTHAL (leans in):
“We could use someone like her in the next phase of the Femme Trust model. She doesn’t believe in ‘radical’ economic change for the sake of it. She wants something that works—and she’s smart enough to see how we could shape a new economic system that bances both genders, rather than pits them against each other. She would be... an asset to the cause.”
MORGAN YATES:
“I agree. But we need to be careful. Ivy’s ideological flexibility could become a double-edged sword. She’s looking for practical solutions, but she isn’t married to any particur model. She could easily slip into a more corporate-centric mindset if we’re not aligned on the bigger picture.”
MAYA ROSENTHAL (with a smirk):
“True. But that’s why we’re in the perfect position to guide her. She’s malleable. She doesn’t take sides; she takes solutions. And right now, we need someone who can move between the radical and the pragmatic.”
MORGAN YATES:
“I’ll have my team keep an eye on her. If she’s interested in moving forward with 6C’s Femme Trust or helping redefine our metrics, we’ll need to make sure we can control the direction. But if she can steer clear of the more corporate traps—and stay true to the bance she’s speaking about—she could really take us to the next level.”
MAYA ROSENTHAL (nodding, eyes narrowing with focus):
“We won’t know unless we test her. Invite her for a deeper conversation. Not a recruitment pitch, but a ‘disruption session.’ If she’s willing to sit at the table and explore where this movement could go... she’s in. But she’ll have to earn her pce in this conversation.”
MORGAN YATES (grins):
“I’ll arrange something. You know how these things work. The best way to bring her in... is to get her to think she’s steering the ship herself.”
MAYA ROSENTHAL (ughing quietly):
“Exactly. Let’s keep her in the loop, but make sure the agenda is ours. She’s got the potential to be a wildcard in all the right ways.”
They both stand, exchanging a look of quiet understanding.
MORGAN YATES:
“We’ll start with a casual meeting—something with no strings attached. I’ll reach out to her team.”
MAYA ROSENTHAL:
“Good. I want to see how she handles the pressure when we throw some real questions her way.”
***
Invitation Extended to Ivy Thompson — The Underlying Web of Influence
INT. MODERN COFFEE SHOP — DAY
Maya Rosenthal sits at a sleek, minimalist table, absently stirring her coffee. The glow of the ptop screen reflects off her gsses as she carefully types out an email to Ivy Thompson. She leans back, sighs deeply, and begins typing.
MAYA ROSENTHAL (V.O., typing):
“Dear Ivy,
It was a pleasure to listen to your thoughts during the recent event. Your ability to navigate both the academic and practical realms of urban pnning, economics, and social change is impressive. I believe we have much to discuss, especially concerning the role of masculinity and gender dynamics in the future of economic systems. Your perspective challenges some of my own thinking, and I would love to explore that further.
If you’re open to a deeper conversation, I would be thrilled to meet in person or over a video call. I think there’s real potential for colboration between our ideas, and I’m eager to hear more of your thoughts on the subject.
Best regards,
Maya Rosenthal”
Maya hits send, her fingers hovering over the keys. There's a small thrill of anticipation mixed with a faint, nagging doubt in the pit of her stomach. After all, her speeches and increasingly radical ideas are beginning to get more attention than she can handle, and her workpce is not pleased. The financial backing from various unknown sources, including Liberty Daughters Party and CBI, has been the fuel for her public speaking career. But the cost of her involvement, the tension at her job, and the possibility that she might lose her job entirely in the coming weeks weigh heavily on her mind.
INT. OFFICE BUILDING — DAY
Later, Maya is on her way to her office. The quiet hum of fluorescent lights above contrasts sharply with the storm brewing in her chest. She walks into her office, gncing nervously at her computer screen. A notification fshes: "Meeting with HR - URGENT."
Her heart sinks as she picks up the phone to call her assistant.
MAYA ROSENTHAL:
(softly, almost to herself)
“I’ve got to stop thinking about this. Focus on the bigger picture.”
Her assistant answers.
ASSISTANT (V.O.):
“Maya, just letting you know that HR is scheduling a meeting with you for 3 PM today. They’re... not pleased with your recent speeches. They said you’ll need to expin yourself.”
Maya exhales, running a hand through her hair, pushing down the anxiety creeping up her spine.
MAYA ROSENTHAL:
“Thanks. I’ll be there.”
She sms the phone down. This is the third warning in as many weeks. But despite the pressure, Maya has come to realize that the pull of her ideas, the possibility of reshaping the system, is far more intoxicating than the threat of a termination letter.
INT. LUXURY HOTEL SUITE — NIGHT
Meanwhile, Morgan Yates stands in front of a rge window, overlooking the city skyline. Behind her, a group of 6C operatives gather around a polished wooden table. She’s just finished reading Maya’s email inviting Ivy Thompson to a deeper conversation. She turns, gncing at the operatives.
MORGAN YATES (to operatives):
“Maya Rosenthal is pying her part very well. But let’s not forget... none of this happens without us. The events, the speeches... her journey is part of a rger pn.”
The operatives nod, acknowledging the covert influence they hold over Maya’s trajectory, including the financial support from the Liberty Daughters Party (LDP) and CBI.
MORGAN YATES (to herself, smiling):
“And soon, Ivy Thompson will be part of the equation. Maya doesn’t realize that her ally, her ideological comrade, is also someone we’ve been keeping an eye on. It’s all about control. Soon, they’ll both be on the same team — whether they know it or not.”
INT. LUXURY CONFERENCE ROOM — LATER THAT WEEK
Maya meets Ivy Thompson for their first face-to-face discussion. The room is pristine, filled with quiet anticipation. Ivy, dressed in a sharp bck jacket and white blouse, enters confidently. Maya stands up, extending a hand.
MAYA ROSENTHAL (smiling warmly):
“I’m so gd you could make it. I think we have a lot to talk about, Ivy.”
Ivy smiles back, her sharp eyes studying Maya with an intensity that belies her calm demeanor.
IVY THOMPSON:
“Likewise. Your speech really caught my attention. You’re asking some interesting questions about masculinity, gender, and economics... questions that I think are overdue in most academic circles.”
They both sit down, facing each other across the table. Ivy leans forward, clearly interested.
MAYA ROSENTHAL:
“I’ve been reflecting on what you said—about integrating masculinity in a way that doesn’t diminish the value of feminine empowerment. I think this is an area that’s rgely overlooked in economic discourse. The idea that power must be exclusive, when it can actually be symbiotic...”
(she hesitates, catching herself)
“But I know that can be a hard pill to swallow, given everything happening right now.”
Ivy nods, her expression thoughtful.
IVY THOMPSON:
“It’s more than just a pill to swallow. It’s about understanding how deeply ingrained economic models have become in our culture. Masculinity, as you say, has been sidelined in some areas, but also overemphasized in others. I think we need to look at how those structures can coexist, to push forward with a system that doesn’t just rely on one.”
Maya listens carefully, intrigued by Ivy’s insights.
MAYA ROSENTHAL (leaning forward):
“Exactly. And that’s where I think 6C has the potential to lead. A hybrid economic system that doesn’t isote power into one gender or one type of structure. We could... create something new, together.”
Ivy pauses, her eyes narrowing as she contemptes Maya’s words.
IVY THOMPSON:
“I’m open to that conversation. But, I have to ask... are you aware of the rger forces shaping these ideas?”
Maya’s pulse quickens, but she hides it behind a professional smile.
MAYA ROSENTHAL:
“I’m just here to push the conversation forward, Ivy. If the systems work together, it’s worth exploring.”
Scene: The Unseen Web
INT. HIGH-END CONFERENCE ROOM — NIGHT
Behind closed doors, Morgan Yates and a group of 6C operatives review Ivy Thompson’s interaction with Maya Rosenthal.
MORGAN YATES (with a calcuting smile):
“Let’s keep this quiet for now. Maya doesn’t need to know who is really pulling the strings. She’s a key pyer. We need her fully on board before revealing too much.”
The operatives exchange gnces, and a hushed murmur of agreement fills the air. The power dynamics are shifting, and Maya—unbeknownst to her—has just taken the first step into a much rger game.
***
