PRESS EVENT TRANSCRIPT — National Syndication Broadcast
Location: Baton Rouge Capitol Annex, Louisiana
Coverage: FOX News, CNN, CBS, ABC, NPR, Reuters
Event: Official Unveiling of “6C Economics: Post-Employment Framework”
Date: [Insert Date]
[CAMERAS ROLL]
[Hezri enters, fnked by Elise Carter and Naomi Chen]
[Seal of the 6 Commandments behind the podium. Fgs of 20 6C states surround the press area.]
HEZRI (at podium):
"Good citizens, believers, and thinkers of the post-liberal age.
Today, I name Naomi Chen as National Communications Director of the 6 Commandments.
She brings with her a decade of experience fighting hollow constitutionalism, and constructing a new grammar for truth in the American discourse.
She is the voice between history and what comes next.
Naomi, take the floor."
[Naomi Chen steps up — asymmetrical bob glinting under stage light, crisp navy suit, Yale poise]
NAOMI CHEN:
“Thank you, Supreme Legistor Hezri.
Thank you, members of the national press — yes, even those who've sndered us before.
Today marks a pivot. Not just for Louisiana, but for political imagination across all twenty states of our new federation.
We call it: 6C Economics.”
“And no, it’s not about jobs. Because jobs are fiction. The unemployment rate? It’s a 20th-century psychological weapon — a metric built to shame, not to liberate. We’re deleting it.”
[Murmurs from CNN and NPR reporters]
NAOMI CHEN CONTINUES:
“In Louisiana, we are unching the first pilot of a Post-Employment Economy, crafted by a strategic unit whose identities remain cssified for national security.”
“Let me be clear. This is not a universal basic income.
This is not capitalism.
This is not communism.
This is alignment economics.”
KEY POINTS FROM THE MODEL (as Naomi outlines them):
No More 'Jobs':
Citizens are no longer categorized by employment or unemployment. Instead, they are assessed through a Relevance Index—their material, social, and spiritual contributions to the commune.
Trust-Based Distribution:
Economic production and resources are distributed through registered family structures, communal trusts, and Femme Pods—female-led domestic and service networks.
Faith-Linked Currencies:
Three-tier currency model:
Trust Credits
Domestic Tokens
Scripture Exchange Points (SEP)
No Pork. No Gambling.
Louisiana’s economy is now pork-free and vice-free, redirecting funds and skills into aquaculture, herbal pharmacology, and women-led domestic economies.
NAOMI CHEN:
“This isn’t a regression. It’s an advance beyond liberal contradictions.
Polygamous households are no longer marginalized — they are the economic engine.
Femme partner networks, formally unrecognized before, now operate as legal trusts with autonomous bor rights.”
FOX NEWS REPORTER:
“So you're saying women in polygamous households can have… unlimited female partners and run businesses from those bonds?”
NAOMI (smiling coolly):
“Yes. It’s called the Femme Cuse. And it’s revolutionizing property ownership and care economies faster than any federal welfare program in history.”
CBS CORRESPONDENT:
“But who wrote this economic doctrine? What think tank? What economist?”
NAOMI:
“The architect is protected under national executive cssification.
What I can say is this: the model fuses cybernetic pnning, spiritual indexing, and communal trust architecture.
Louisiana is our b. The country is watching.
The future will follow.”
[Press cameras fsh. Elise Carter nods from the side. Hezri watches, unreadable.]
[Naomi exits stage-right, fnked by security, face stone-set in icy confidence.]
[Segment ends with FOX and CNN cutting to debate panels, already spinning the announcement.]
End of Press Event
Naomi’s national profile spikes 48% on X, TikTok, and Substack in under 3 hours.
****
FOX NEWS & CNN — Simultaneous Broadcast Coverage
Segment Title (FOX): “Woke Feudalism or Faith-Based Freedom?”
Segment Title (CNN): “Post-Employment Louisiana? Breaking Down 6C Economics”
[FOX NEWS PANEL – "The Patriot Frontline"]
HOST: LAURA BANNON (Conservative Political Commentator)
GUESTS: Col. Greg Harn (Ret.), Anna McRae (Economist), Bishop Thaddeus Roy (Evangelical Leader)
LAURA BANNON:
“Louisiana just became the guinea pig in a radical religious experiment. No more jobs. No more unemployment stats. What is this—medieval technocracy?”
COL. HARLAN:
“This is what happens when you mix Silicon Valley brainwashing with Sharia-lite theology. They don’t believe in freedom. They believe in control. Relevance Index? That’s a social credit system in religious drag.”
ANNA MCRAE (Former Cato Institute):
“It’s not economics, Laura. It’s algorithmic feudalism. You’re not a citizen anymore. You’re a node in a theocratic network. Your household trust decides your value. Not the market. Not your skills.”
BISHOP ROY:
“Now, I’m no fan of 6C’s authoritarianism, but let’s be honest. At least they’re banning gambling and pork, not grooming our kids. They’re building discipline where D.C. builds debt.”
LAURA BANNON (gritting):
“But you can’t just delete the word unemployment like a bad tweet. What are they hiding? Poverty? Surveilnce?”
......
[CNN PANEL – "Civic Futures"]
HOST: NIALE ROBINS (Center-Left Journalist)
GUESTS: Dr. Eleanor Quaye (Post-Capitalist Theorist), Marcus Boyd (Former Obama Econ Advisor), Zara Lin (6C-aligned influencer)
NIALE ROBINS:
“The 6C just decred war on the bor market. They’re saying employment metrics are obsolete. Let’s go straight to the economist—Dr. Quaye, is this nonsense or the future?”
DR. QUAYE:
“It’s not nonsense. It’s dangerous and visionary. They're moving away from bor monetization toward what they call Relevance Economy. It’s decentralized, post-liberal, and built on kinship and ritual trust rather than wage bor.”
MARCUS BOYD:
“But it centralizes power under one ideology. You can’t have algorithmic welfare administered by priests and still call it liberation. What about autonomy? Dissent?”
ZARA LIN (via satellite, calm):
“The critics fear what they can’t model. But Louisiana will prove this: when women lead domestic trusts, when men adapt to spiritual bor instead of economic dominance—violence goes down, wellness goes up. This is the feminine-coded economy. Welcome to the post-patriarchal market.”
NIALE ROBINS:
“Even if it’s post-patriarchal, isn’t it still… authoritarian?”
ZARA LIN (smiling):
“Authority isn’t the problem. Unaligned authority is. Hezri’s regime has alignment. D.C. has dysfunction.”
[SOCIAL MEDIA TRENDS FOLLOWING THE SEGMENTS]
#RelevanceEconomy (trending on X, 180K tweets)
“6C = CryptoCaliphate?” (Reddit thread explodes with 14K comments)
“Femme Trusts” meme explodes on TikTok (1.2M views in 4 hours)
Naomi Chen fan edits begin circuting among Gen Z feminist collectives
****
MSNBC SPECIAL PANEL — “Louisiana: Test State or Theocracy?”
Host: Rachel Mendelsohn
Guests:
? Mayor Patrice Duvernay – Exiled Mayor of Baton Rouge (Democrat)
? Dr. Lionel Kent – Left-wing Post-Keynesian Economist (Berkeley)
? Dr. Jared Hoyle – Conservative Supply-Side Economist (Heritage Foundation)
RACHEL MENDELSOHN (Opening Statement):
“Tonight, we explore a seismic shift: 6C’s economic model is now live in Louisiana. No more employment figures. No more job market as we know it. They call it ‘Relevance Economics.’ Is it innovation—or indoctrination?”
MAYOR PATRICE DUVERNAY (Exiled, visibly frustrated):
“Let me be clear. This isn’t reform—it’s erasure. They’ve abolished public accountability. No wages, no unemployment data, no public sector unions. I was forced out because I refused to let my city become a theological simution experiment.”
DR. LIONEL KENT (Left-wing):
“The irony is, some of this could have been visionary. Decoupling income from employment? We’ve theorized that for decades. But under a closed theocratic model? It becomes techno-feudalism. Relevance scores are not liberating—they’re behavior tracking.”
DR. JARED HOYLE (Conservative):
“Now hold on. Let’s not throw the algorithm out with the data set. Traditional employment models are broken. The 6C’s ‘domestic trust’ system, especially the femme cuse dynamics, are unorthodox—but they’ve created voluntary bor clusters and dramatically reduced male joblessness.”
RACHEL MENDELSOHN:
“But Jared, the ‘femme cuse’ lets wives form formalized female partner networks, register them as economic trusts, and reduce required time with their husbands. Isn’t that gender inversion under a patriarchal banner?”
HOYLE (smirking):
“It’s disruptive, sure. But if it creates stable units and reduces state dependency, why should we oppose it? Men adapting to spiritual bor? Sounds a lot like Chesterton with a TikTok filter.”
DUVERNAY (cutting in):
“You can’t quantify dignity. My constituents weren’t told their jobs were being ritually reassigned. They were just told to submit.”
DR. KENT:
“It’s not an economy. It’s a behavioral operating system with sacred branding. And when you remove wage transparency and repce it with ‘ritual honor,’ you create the perfect conditions for css exploitation.”
CLOSING TICKER (MSNBC SCREEN):
"6C's Relevance Economy divides economists."
"Is Louisiana a tempte—or a trap?"
***
MSNBC Special Feature: “Inside the Femme Trust” — Shreveport, Louisiana
Segment Host: Amira Bhandari
[Opening Scene: drone shot over suburban Shreveport]
Voiceover:
“Once known for oil rigs and jazz halls, Shreveport is now home to the first officially registered ‘Femme Trust Collective’ under 6C’s experimental economic framework. This is not a commune. Not a co-op. It’s something stranger… and possibly more strategic.”
[Interior shot: a modern ranch-style home. Women gather around a sleek central table with tablets, spreadsheets open. Soft lighting, cyber-minimalist décor.]
ON SCREEN TEXT: “FEMME TRUST COLLECTIVE / REGISTRY 001 - LOUISIANA”
Amira (to camera):
“What happens when marriage w, female agency, and economic theory merge under a theocracy? Welcome to Registry 001.”
Interview Clip: MEGAN ALDRIDGE, Trust Lead
“We’re all wives in polygamous households. But this trust gives us collective bargaining power—both sexually and economically. We track our contributions, manage the emotional bor schedule, and allocate spiritual credit in ways our husbands legally can’t contest.”
Amira (voiceover):
“Under the 6C’s ‘Wife Femme Cuse,’ women in polygamous marriages can register an autonomous collective. These trusts can include non-married women and are legally protected from male interference, provided they meet spiritual metrics and domestic stability thresholds.”
Interview Clip: TAMIKA JONES, Femme Member (not married)
“I was unemployed. Now, I’m a ‘spiritual care partner’ and get quarterly dividends in housing credits, ritual points, and influence tokens. I haven’t had a boss in months.”
[Footage of group meditation, digital dashboards, shared kitchen routines, and colborative 'femme pnning']
Amira (to camera):
“Critics call it ‘ritualized polyfeminism.’ Supporters say it’s a post-employment survival model with moral symmetry.”
Interview Clip: HUSBAND (blurred face, voice disguised):
“It’s weird, yeah. I get two days a week per wife. But my house is calm. Bills are handled. And the trust reports to the state better than I ever did.”
[Cut to think tank analyst from DC, remote feed.]
DR. MARIELLE O’CONNOR (Brookings Parallel Institute):
“These Femme Trusts are like spiritual credit unions. They operate in a loophole where religious w, feminist autonomy, and economic gamification meet. We’ve never seen anything like it.”
Final Scene: sunset over the trust house, women on porch drinking tea
Voiceover (Amira):
“In a state without unemployment and an economy run on ritual, the Femme Trust may be the most radically stabilizing—and quietly revolutionary—force yet.”
***
6C Headquarters Press Auditorium, Des Moines, Iowa – Noon. Dozens of reporters from major outlets seated. Multiple camera crews. A rge emblem of the "6 Commandments" looms behind the podium.]
ON STAGE:
Naomi Chen — National Communication Director, precision-cut bob, navy bzer, composed and surgical in tone.
Elise Carter — Chairwoman of the Central Parliament (CP), elegant, observing with a poised smile.
Naomi Chen steps to the microphone. Fshes pop. Silence falls.
NAOMI CHEN:
“Good afternoon. On behalf of the Central Parliament and Supreme Executive, I am honored to announce two historic developments in our ongoing stabilization effort across the twenty states governed by 6C w.”
First — effective immediately, the 6C Economics Protocol enters its national test phase, beginning in the state of Louisiana. As you may know, this new economic model—developed by top-tier minds in quantitative restructuring—abolishes obsolete metrics such as 'employment' and 'unemployment.' Instead, it calibrates human value around spiritual productivity, ritual responsibility, and communal harmony indices. Detailed frameworks will be released to press within the hour.
“We believe this shift reflects not only theological crity but economic precision. Our future is not one of jobs—it is one of roles.”
Pauses. Gnces to Elise, who nods subtly.
Second — crification and formal activation of the Wife Femme Cuse within the Polygamy Harmonization Act. While, by default, child custody in polygamous marriage remains under the father—mirroring monogamous standards—there is now a full override provision. If the mother, or any unmarried woman in the household, is registered within a certified Femme Group Trust, then legal custody is reallocated entirely to the Femme Trust Collective.”
“This is not merely a legal footnote. It affirms what 6C has long known: that collective feminine governance, when sanctified by spiritual alignment and social contribution, is the most stabilizing institution within our society.”
Reporters begin typing furiously. Murmurs ripple.
NAOMI CHEN (final tone):
“These policies are not experiments. They are doctrines reimagined as algorithms. And together, they will ensure 6C states remain not only morally superior—but economically invincible.”
[Appuse from curated audience sectors. Cameras continue to fsh. Elise leans forward and smiles.]
ELISE CARTER (leaning in to mic):
“History won’t remember what we banned. It will remember what we built.”
***
CNN Live Segment – “Inside Politics Tonight”]
Host: Erin Valdez, seated at central roundtable with three pundits.
ERIN VALDEZ:
“Welcome back. We’re tracking breaking news out of Iowa, where the 6C theocratic government unveiled a major expansion of its already-controversial polygamy framework. The spotlight now falls on the so-called Wife Femme Cuse, which allows female collectives—known as Femme Trusts—to cim exclusive custody of children within a polygamous marriage. Let’s bring in our panel.”
ON THE PANEL:
Dr. Lena Hartford, Gender Policy Analyst, Columbia University (Progressive)
Joshua Redding, Senior Fellow at the Hudson Foundation (Conservative)
Nia Rowe, Culture Commentator, The Streamline Podcast
DR. LENA HARTFORD:
“This cuse reframes maternal power in a deeply patriarchal framework. It’s radical—yes—but it’s also an internal rebellion. Women inside a rigid theocracy finding new forms of sovereignty. These Femme Trusts might become safe havens—micro-matriarchies, even.”
JOSHUA REDDING:
“Let’s not pretend this is empowering. This is state-sanctioned custody collectivism. It strips biological fathers of their rights based on ideological affiliation. What if a father dissents from his wives' beliefs? He’s erased. That’s authoritarianism with a velvet glove.”
NIA ROWE:
“It’s messy, sure. But look—TikTok’s already calling these women 'The Femme Guard.’ Gen Z sees this not as oppression, but evolution. Communal motherhood with digital branding? It's edgy. Dangerous. Irresistible.”
[CUT TO: SOCIAL MEDIA REACTIONS – SPLIT SCREEN]
X (formerly Twitter):
@PolyFemNation: “Custody to the Femme Trust? Finally, a cuse that trusts women’s sisterhood more than patriarchy’s paperwork.”
@DadRightsNow: “So men in Louisiana just became sperm donors with prayer rugs? #6Cmadness”
@FemmeCryptoPriestess: “Form your trust. Register your femmes. Save the next generation. #FemmeCuse”
TikTok Trends:
#FemmeTrustChallenge (young women parodying trust registration scenes)
#HezriVerse (fan edits of 6C leadership and femme influencers)
#CustodyRecimed (activist wyers breaking down the w)
ERIN VALDEZ (closing tone):
“What happens in Louisiana may soon shape legal custody battles across twenty states. Whether you see it as justice or jurisdictional overreach, one thing is clear—the Femme Cuse just turned 6C’s cultural war into a custody war.”
***
CNN SPECIAL SEGMENT: “The New Theocracy: 6C’s Economics & Femme Cuse”]
Host: Amira Daniels sits center stage with a split screen showing two live guests in debate.
GUESTS:
Dr. Viktor Mahlstein, Austrian School Economist, author of “Freedom Through Markets”
Professor Kiara Bell, Feminist Legal Schor, author of “The Matriarchal Imagination”
AMIRA DANIELS:
“Tonight, we’re examining two controversial fronts of the 6C regime—its newly unched economic model that eliminates the very concept of ‘employment,’ and its Wife Femme Cuse in polygamy w, now in effect across Louisiana. Let’s begin. Dr. Mahlstein, does the 6C economy make any sense to you?”
DR. VIKTOR MAHLSTEIN (scoffing):
“None. It’s economic surrealism. Abolishing 'employment' as a category doesn’t eliminate bor. It obscures value creation. Productivity still exists, but it’s hidden behind trust collectivism, spiritual bor, or what they call ‘retional output.’ This is postmodern command economy in theological dress.”
PROF. KIARA BELL (calm, intense):
“But that’s the point, isn’t it? They're rejecting the wage-sve model. Under the Femme Cuse, bor isn't just paid—it’s shared. Women's work is no longer atomized in nuclear units. It's distributed, socially validated. You may not like that the state validates these Femme Trusts, but it’s an evolution.”
DR. MAHLSTEIN:
“Evolution into what? Tribal matriarchy under religious rule? If women want rights, why are they ceding them to trusts based on their intimacy networks? It's collectivist soft tyranny wrapped in silk and virtue.”
PROF. BELL (cutting in):
“The same intimacy networks men built for millennia—old boys’ clubs, corporate boards—you didn’t call that tyranny. Femme Trusts are networks of interdependence, not domination. And let’s not ignore that these trusts override paternal custody—an intentional reversal of patriarchal default w.”
AMIRA DANIELS:
“Strong points. But what about the concern that children now belong to ‘the collective’ of women, not to individuals?”
PROF. BELL:
“It’s no more radical than any religious commune or aristocratic estate. The difference is—it’s the mothers and femmes writing the rules. In a theocracy no less. That’s power.”
DR. MAHLSTEIN:
“And dangerous. Power divorced from price signals always is. You’ll get moral credit, not real output. An economy that rewards proximity to ideology, not merit. And that colpses.”
[SOCIAL MEDIA CHYRON – REACTIONS LIVE]
@FemmeTrustor: “Kiara Bell is ying down gospel. Femme Cuse = generational repair.”
@FreeMarketFist: “Mahlstein spitting facts: no price, no freedom.”
@SoftPowerSarah: “Collectivized mothering isn't tyranny, it's evolution. #6Cshift”
AMIRA DANIELS (closing):
“As 6C continues its social and economic experiments, the world watches with equal parts awe and apprehension. Tomorrow, we explore how tech firms are responding to Femme Trust registration APIs. Stay with us.”
***
CONFIDENTIAL MEETING OF FEMINIST LEADERS, SAN MARCOS, TEXAS]
Setting: A converted art gallery in a quiet downtown block. Dozens of women, schors, community organizers, former wmakers, and coalition leaders are seated in a circur formation. The air is tense but electric. Coffee and hand-printed zines on “Femme Sovereignty” circute quietly.
Attendees:
Dr. Sasha McCin – Western Feminist Coalition
Ava Nguyen – State Legistor, Central Texas
Rachel Cruz – South Texas Rep, critical of 6C
Soraya Delgado – Border Women’s Cooperative
Tanya Greenfield – Queer Economic Futures Collective
Zainab Khatun – Academic, Gender & Law
SASHA MCCLAIN:
“Let’s cut to it. The Wife Femme Cuse is reshaping custody w, domestic power, and even resource rights—within a theocracy. That contradiction is our entry point. This isn’t liberation, but it isn’t patriarchy either. It’s…something new.”
AVA NGUYEN (leaning forward):
“We’re witnessing a strange bifurcation. On one hand, women are forming legally binding collectives under a religious regime. On the other—men lose legal custody to femme units. That cuse just flipped 200 years of jurisprudence.”
RACHEL CRUZ (shaking head):
“But at what cost? We can’t celebrate stolen custody just because it’s matriarchal now. It’s still state-weaponized family restructuring. The husbands are still in charge of the state apparatus. They allow this because it makes them look post-patriarchal.”
SORAYA DELGADO:
“Our Co-op has had three women from Shreveport join us st week. All femme-registered. They’re convinced they’re building real autonomy inside the 6C system. They say, ‘the state doesn’t own us—we gamed it.’”
TANYA GREENFIELD:
“But what if the 6C economic transition—Priya’s model or whoever wrote it—is actually opening room for femme economies? No wage dependence. No male-brokered bor. I hate the source—but the implications are real.”
ZAINAB KHATUN (quiet but firm):
“The danger is abstraction. ‘Femme power’ means little if it’s unaccompanied by exit rights. If you can’t leave the Trust… if you’re coerced by spiritual guilt, by cultural pressure—it becomes a velvet cage.”
SASHA MCCLAIN:
“So we need data. On custody outcomes. On resource flows. On whether femme groups act democratically or become new hierarchies. We can’t just debate morality—we need measurable power.”
AVA NGUYEN:
“I propose a task force. Cross-organizational. Non-partisan. Quiet, for now. We track Femme Trust formation, legal outcomes, and economic redistribution inside 6C zones. We map the ecosystem.”
UNANIMOUS MURMURS OF AGREEMENT.
RACHEL CRUZ (reluctant):
“Fine. But we don’t romanticize the regime while doing it. They still ban Pauline texts, pork, and gamble with people’s rights. Just because they added women to the table doesn’t mean they’re feeding us.”
SORAYA (softly):
“Maybe. Or maybe we’re starting to cook.”
[Meeting adjourns. Sasha remains behind, staring quietly at a printed page: “FEMME TRUSTS AS NON-STATE POWER – Preliminary Memo” with Priya Varma’s pseudonym listed in the corner.]
